G.) The marriage away from Draw MEEKS and Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

The guy bought and you can improved here exactly what turned his house with the 2nd 22 age and on this one all the pupils was indeed produced but the 2 oldest. During the 1891 he ended up selling which household and you may ordered area 32 when you look at the cut-off ten regarding five miles northeast away from Chillicothe, he improved and you may remaining since the a home-stead.

Bound to and you will registered before me, that it twenty-first day of October

His Religious lifetime offered due to a time period of over 40 years. He kept firmly into Ancient Baptist faith, hence turned his whole comfort inside the past weeks and also by each other precepts and you will example he depicted the highest type of an enthusiastic Western citizen.

Draw MEEKS’ second relationships, so you can Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] is September 21, 1858 into the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. You’ll find nothing identified on a marriage so you can a beneficial COHEN besides the marriage permit, recorded at the Relationships Guide step one, webpage 914, suggestions the marriage once the between elizabeth, and you will Sarah made her mark. The marriage is did by the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

I, T. T. KERLEY, would solemnly swear that we in the morning 21 yrs . old, and that Miss W. C. MEEKS try 18/eight years of age, and this there aren’t any courtroom arguments to the Relationships. J. C. WELLS becoming sworn claims your moms and dads away from Skip W. C. MEEKS enjoys considering their full accept to the marriage of their daughter in order to Mr. T.

Sarah and you can Draw existed west of Haynesville within the Claiborne Parish to have some time together with probably just one child, Willia Celestia MEEKS, this new spouse out-of T. All the family unit members details mean that Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY was created November 31, 1865, from the Hope, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, in addition to grave marker implies a date away from delivery away from 1865. I would suggest, not, your day from delivery could have in reality been November 30, 1863 in lieu of you to definitely time inside 1865. Without a doubt, there’s absolutely no beginning certification. The latest passing certificate is not any assist, since it means a date away from delivery off November 30, 1886, over 5 years following the big date out-of their wedding. It will suggest a years during the death of 52, and since the newest dying taken place January 16, 1919, she would was produced in the 1866, putting some 1886 more than likely a good typographical error. To get various birth day, I’ve about three arguments:

• The new census taker in 1870, performing August 23, 1870, showed that the newest newborns decades was 9. Whenever you are census takers is notoriously crappy at the many years, it’s very unusual, I think, regarding young an infant having a delivery go out that far away. It can only be three years wrong into the corrected date in the place of five years wrong to your 1965 day. This new 1880 census taker detailed age since 18, once again too old to own sometimes time and you can incorrect since prior to their unique wedding, demonstrated lower than, when she wasn’t yet 18.
• Probably the most serious dispute I’ve ‘s the marriage permit, copied verbatim to the profile ?. There’s two change toward published setting, the initial being the requirements that the lady feel at least to get yrs old in place of adult agree, plus the 2nd being your aside-dated means is printed for use to your first around three digits of your own go out getting « 187 », that’s crossed on reveal a romantic date of Oct 21, 1881. To have a good November 29th birthday and stay seventeen, the entire year out of delivery must be 1863. In the event that she really was fifteen as opposed to regarding the a month timid out-of you are, would the new clerk has recognized the definition of of groom’s cousin that the bride’s moms and dads recognized the wedding?